Sunday, October 04, 2009
MH 505
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Greenhouse Emissions
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Election results
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Democracy - Equality and Liberty
given to all. It was initially based on sex, wealth, age. Today in a democracy the right to equal treatment is shared by all citizens of a country over a certain age. Equality becomes critical during decision making. Equality aims to guarantee participation and thus avoid a situation where one party decides to disobey the decision because they were not allowed to participate in the decision making process.
Liberty has just as many connotations as equality and they again affect expectations of democracy. Experts suggest three set of ideas for liberty - republican,liberal and idealist. The republican view measures liberty in terms of a free political community. The liberal view is more concerned with individual freedom to do as he/she pleases. In between these views is the idealist view where the individual has the freedom but also the sense to make the right choices or demands.
But obviously a nation is more than an individual. Therefore it is the manner in which individual freedom interacts with the group that ties liberty to democracy. As individuals don't live in isolation, it is important that an individual's freedom of action does not infringe the freedom of others. Some experts see this as the only role for the state. Anything more and they see it as a threat to liberty.
It is this mix of individual rights and being an equal participant in decision making collectively that causes the tension between equality and liberty. A classic example is the desire to bring about economic equality. This can lead to a collective/majority decision to tax the rich more than others, thus infringing the right of the rich to spend their money as they choose. In such a situation, self rule is cited as a way out...and how self rule is to be achieved marks the major division between various forms of democracy.
At one extreme is what is known as Participatory Democracy. At the other extreme is the idea that people are willing to be ruled by a set of people chosen by them periodically [Representative/liberal] which often is the layman's definition of democracy. In between lies various shades, an example for which is people voting on an issue of national importance[Referendum]. Also, in order to restrain unchecked majority rule, an upper chamber is often recommended which will consist of meritorious experts in different areas.
So clearly it is difficult for a society to define what their expectations from this philosophy is. This fine balancing act gets more difficult when you start adding riders to the two opposing yet required forces. These riders include reservations, different laws for different sections of the society, etc.
Is it surprising then that our in-competent members of the legislature have done away with these goals of democracy and reduced it to a power game.
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Violated...
In fact, there are more terror strikes in India than any other nation(except Iraq and that's not much of a nation right now)...and we have ambitions of being a World Player???? How??
Will resign when Sonia ji asks to leave: Patil
Mr. Patil our home minister...the lesser said of his work the better (http://blogmia.blogspot.com/2007/06/india-burning.html)...but resigning if Sonia ji asks? Wasn't the cabinet selected by the PM, hmmm?
A quick check of course tells us that this government is headed by some one who has not won an election...now i don't want to get into whether its people's loss that he is not a member of the Lok Sabha, for he is surely one of the cleanest leaders we have...but not having obtained mandate is unacceptable all the same. Sonia ji of course is just a member of the parliament - but as the convener of UPA she enjoys cabinet status....and therefore the right to select the cabinet?
And yes, Mr. Shivraj Patil lost his Latur seat in the elections...
Thursday, July 24, 2008
WTF
Our politicians sure have a habit of surpassing all expectations of the people and are the role models for today's generation. Just when we think that things can't go any worse, that surely we have hit the rock bottom of morality and ethics they snicker at us and prove us wrong.
And we all know the names that cross voted...so why isn’t there a IT raid at their homes and why arent their accounts being scrutinized for any shady transfers...wouldn't these be the best candidate to start the investigation on?
Now that the vote has been won, the government is being pressed to fulfil the promises made to get the support...so the government that talks about the nuclear deal as necessary for the advancement of technology also claims that Ram destroyed the setu on his return from Lanka...when I first read that, I was ready to puke...I mean who are they trying to kid here?....and I really want to know who has such fantastic imagination!!!
Seriously we are in desperate need of an over haul of our system...this is beyond crass;beyond repulsive.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
UN Millennium Development Goals
...Why arent more people talking about these?? Especially in countries like ours...all governments whether at the centre or the states should be measured against these...
In September 2000, at the Millenium Summit of the UN, 189 leaders of their respective countries came together and adopted a set of 8 goals to make Earth a more welcoming place for the future generations...Of the 8 goals, 7 are time bound and measurable and the 8th is an ideal goal for our society.
The goals are -
- Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger. The targets under this are -
- Reduce by half the proportion of people living on less than one U.S. dollar a day.
- Reduce by half the proportion of people who suffer from hunger.
- Achieve universal primary education. The targets under this are -
- Ensure that all boys and girls complete a full course of primary schooling.
- Increased enrollment must be accompanied by efforts to ensure that all children remain in school and receive a high-quality education.
- Promote gender equality and empower women. The target under this is -
- Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education preferably by 2005, and at all levels by 2015.
- Reduce child mortality. The target under this is -
- Reduce the mortality rate among children under five by two thirds.
- Improve maternal health. The target under this is -
- Reduce by three quarters the maternal mortality ratio.
- Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases. The targets under this are -
- Halt and begin to reverse the spread of HIV AIDS.
- Halt and begin to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major diseases.
- Ensure environmental sustainability. The targets under this are -
- Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes; reverse loss of environmental resources.
- Reduce by half the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water.
- Achieve significant improvement in lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers, by 2020.
- Develop a global partnership for development. The targets under this are -
- Develop further an open trading and financial system that is rule-based, predictable and non-discriminatory. Includes a commitment to good governance, development and poverty reduction—nationally and internationally.
- Address the least developed countries’ special needs. This includes tariff-and quota-free access for their exports; enhanced debt relief for heavily indebted poor countries; cancellation of official bilateral debt; and more generous official development assistance for countries committed to poverty reduction.
- Address the special needs of landlocked and small island developing States.
- Deal comprehensively with developing countries' debt problems through national and international measures to make debt sustainable in the long term.
- In cooperation with the developing countries, develop decent and productive work for youth.
- In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable essential drugs in developing countries.
- In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies - especially information and communications technologies.
Friday, June 01, 2007
India Burning....
Please note that this is entirely my opinion. Dont complain abt lack of facts. Entirely my opinion and probably biased opinion.
Rating
5 - default rating/average performance
>5 - obviously good
<5 - obviously bad
Pranab Mukherjee - Minister of External Affairs : Vision less External policy under this government...not sure how much he is responsible for it but that's what it is. The only thing to show for is the Nuclear deal...and that is yet to materialize in a manner that won't be considered detrimental to our nuclear power aspirations.
5/10
Arjun Singh - Minister of Human Resource Development : Continues the great work started by his look a like VP Singh. He has made the task of destroying whatever little is left of our homogeneity in to an art form.
0/10
Sharad Pawar - Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution : The only thing on his mind is BCCI and ICC presidentship...not the suicides of farmers.
2/10
Lalu Prasad Yadav - Minister of Railways : Whether it is coz of him or Nitish Kumar before him or simply the effort of the officials, Indian Railway is making money. I just hope it translates into better travel experience, cleaner stations. I can give him the benefit of the doubt.
6/10
Shivraj V. Patil - Minister of Home Affairs : He has made a mockery of the post of Home Minister. I think he epitomizes incompetence. Never has the internal security of our country looked so shabby...Naxals are stronger than ever, NE is still unstable...Kashmir is more unstable than a few yrs back...well I can go on and on...
0/10
Abdul Rehman Antulay - Minister of Minority Affairs : Hmm cant comment on him...so he gets the default rating.
5/10
Sushilkumar Shinde - Minister of Power : No major policy change with regards to the power sector. I think more effort and vision is required considering the power crisis that hangs on our head all the time.
4/10
Ram Vilas Paswan - Minister of Chemicals & Fertilizers and Minister of Steel : Well he isn't happy with the portfolio he has and his agenda is different anyways...
4/10
S. Jaipal Reddy - Minister of Urban Development : Again someone who is not focused on the job at hand.
4/10
Sis Ram Ola - Minister of Mines: no idea.
5/10
P. Chidambaram - Minister of Finance: Tied by the 'Left', his heart is still in the right place...lol..
8/10
Mahavir Prasad - Minister of Small Scale Industries and Minister of Agro & Rural Industries: Umm....
5/10
P.R. Kyndiah - Minister of Tribal Affairs and Minister of Development of North Eastern Region : Is no news good news? NE ain't developing...
5/10
T.R. Baalu - Minister of Shipping, Road Transport & Highways : NDA government had put a lot of focus on roads near the end of their tenure...that has definitely declined.
4.5/10
Shankersinh Vaghela - Minister of Textiles : He wants the Gujrat CM seat...
5/10
Vayalar Ravi - Minister of Overseas Indian Affairs : He has done a decent job so far... but then the ministry isn't much of a ministry.
5/10
Kamal Nath - Minister of Commerce & Industry : Well our exports are booming...we continue our rigid stand at WTO...
7/10
Hansraj Bhardwaj - Minister of Law & Justice : No change...status quo zindabad. Our judiciary really needs an overhaul...
3/10
Sontosh Mohan Dev - Minister of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises : No comments
5/10
Prof. Saif-ud-din Soz - Minister of Water Resources : He wants to go back to Kashmir I think...this is also an area that needs a lot of work...
4/10
Raghuvansh Prasad Singh - Minister of Rural Development : ?
5/10
Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi - Minister of Parliamentary Affairs and Minister of Information & Broadcasting : I&B is in a mess. I think he prefers football...lol...
3.5/10
Mani Shankar Aiyar - Minister of Panchayati Raj.and Minister of Youth Affairs & Sports : Loud mouth!! We don't need Asiad huh? Minister of Sports saying that...imagine...wasnt great with the petroleum portfolio either...
3/10
Meira Kumar - Minister of Social Justice & Empowerment : "I am a minister, I am a minister! Yay...do I have to work?? Huh?"
3.5/10
Murli Deora - Minister of Petroleum & Natural Gas : Above average I think...
5.5/10
Ambika Soni - Minister of Tourism & Culture : "I have a press conference to attend...tourists can wait at the airport"
3/10
A. Raja - Minister of Communications & Information Technology : Mr Maran was better...sadly sacrificed for personal reasons...I don't know abt Mr. Raja.
7/10 for mr. Maran.
Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss - Minister of Health & Family Welfare : "How dare he...I own AIIMS" Polio is still around and increasing again...:(
4/10
Kapil Sibal - Minister of Science & Technology and Minister of Ocean Development : Loud mouth...but doing an OK job I think.
6/10
Prem Chand Gupta - Minister of Company Affairs : Huh?
5/10
Then there are some others with an independent charge....
Oscar Fernandes - Minister of State of the Ministry of Labour and Employment : Nothing to report...
5/10
Renuka Chowdhury - Minister of State of the Ministry of Women & Child Development : Loud mouth...she has such a great opportunity to make a difference...nothin has happened...
4/10
Subodh Kant Sahai - Minister of State of the Ministry of Food Processing Industries : No comments.
5/10
Vilas Muttemwar - Minister of State of the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources : I really would like to know how he is doing...
5/10
Kumari Selja - Minister of State of the Ministry of Urban Employment & Poverty Alleviation : Sounds like a no show...but I am not sure...so...
5/10
Praful Patel - Minister of State of the Ministry of Civil Aviation : He comes across as trying hard...but I think he has little to show for his efforts.
4.5/10
G.K.Vasan - Minister of State of the Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation : What kind of ministry is this?
5/10
This is still a work in progress...if anyone else wanna rate them...please be my guest...
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Democracy - The Institutions
To be effective and active, a citizen should have the knowledge of the fundamental institutions that are presented as the pillars of democracy. Of course it is impractical to expect people to have academic knowledge of these institutions; instead a practical knowledge of the role of each institution should suffice. Although a strict set of institutions is hard to define, the following general characteristics should ideally be established –
- Elected Representatives - Control of government by members of a parliament or assembly etc. elected by citizens.
- Free, fair and frequent elections - with minimal coercion and fraud.
- Freedom of Expression - All citizens should have the right to express themselves on matters political as well others without fear of reprimand from the existing government.
- Access to alternate sources of information - All citizens must have the opportunity to form opinions using data available from multiple sources (as opposed to the "official" sources), so this clearly refers to the freedom of press.
- Autonomous associations - All citizens should have the right to form associations based on interests.
- Inclusive citizenship - All citizens of the country should be bound by the same set of rules and guidelines
- Independence of the judiciary - The judiciary should be accessible to all and more importantly must be separate from the government.
- Impartial civil service - The civil service should be autonomous and not partial towards the government of the day.
Now let us re-examine the institutions with respect to our motherland.
- Elected Representatives - Clearly we have this institution well and running. But the main problem for India is the fact that we have come to a stage where nearly 2 million people are represented by a single person in the Parliament, an average that makes it impossible for a citizen to really make his/her voice heard (all the more reason for him/her to become an active citizen). UK on the other hand has 646 members in the House of Commons making a people/member average of around 100,000 (that is 2o times less than ours). Well one solution could be to raise the total number of seats (will require an amendment as the max perceived strength is 552 according to the constitution). Well it is hard to make things work with 200 odd that do show up in the first place :)
- Free, fair and frequent elections - We definitely do have frequent elections, the other 2 conditions are on dodgy grounds...but I would like to believe that it's not yet a disease. I don't have any data to make an opinion otherwise anyways...
- Freedom of Expression - It is there and it is not there. All depends on what you are trying to say. Books are banned regularly, gag orders are issued too. As for the freedom of press, India was ranked 120 out of 167 by reporters sans frontiers (www.rsf.org) though it does add - "Countries such as the Philippines (111th), India (120th) and Indonesia (117th) figure in the bottom half of the index despite having free and lively independent media, since killings and physical attacks on journalists, along with outdated laws, still prevent a full flowering of the press. Violence against the media in India rarely comes from the authorities but from political activists and in Kashmir from armed groups."
- Access to alternate sources of information - Well again it's there and not there. RTI was brought in to correct this but it has not yet reached the common people (wonder why the government is the least active in spreading the word about it).
- Autonomous associations - The party system thrives here, a little too much perhaps (sigh).
- Inclusive citizenship - This is a problem issue (imho) as it has been the root cause for some of the most deep crevices in our society. Take the special treatment for minorities (separate laws) or the issue of reservation. Both good on paper but deadly in the hands of our "great leaders" and "intellectuals" alike.
- Independence of the judiciary - Overactive at times but definitely and unabashedly independent. So independent that there seems to be no way to cure all the decay that is prevalent (lawyer strikes, long holidays, pending cases, just to name a few).
- Impartial civil service - this has hardly ever existed, some how the bureaucracy has never found its feet.
So how do we ensure that a citizen is active or forced to be active? Umm, next section maybe...
Friday, September 08, 2006
Vande Mataram - II
For that let’s trace the song’s history –
The song is written by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee in what has been described as a highly Sanskritized form of the Bengali language. The song first appeared in his book Anandamatha, published in 1882; it was actually written six years earlier in 1876.
The song has five stanzas.
Vande maataram
sujalaam suphalaam malayaja shiitalaam
Sasyashyaamalaam maataram ||
Shubhrajyotsnaa pulakitayaaminiim
pullakusumita drumadala shobhiniim
suhaasiniim sumadhura bhaashhiniim
sukhadaam varadaam maataram ||
Koti koti kantha kalakalaninaada karaale
koti koti bhujai.rdhR^itakharakaravaale
abalaa keno maa eto bale
bahubaladhaariniim namaami taariniim
ripudalavaariniim maataram ||
Tumi vidyaa tumi dharma
tumi hR^idi tumi marma
tvam hi praanaaH shariire
Baahute tumi maa shakti
hR^idaye tumi maa bhakti
tomaara i pratimaa gaDi
mandire mandire ||
Tvam hi durgaa dashapraharanadhaarinii
kamalaa kamaladala vihaarinii
vaanii vidyaadaayinii namaami tvaam
namaami kamalaam amalaam atulaam
Sujalaam suphalaam maataram ||
Shyaamalaam saralaam susmitaam bhuushhitaam
Dharaniim bharaniim maataram |
.....and the translation by Shree Aurobindo -
Mother, I bow to thee!
Rich with thy hurrying streams,
bright with orchard gleams,
Cool with thy winds of delight,
Dark fields waving Mother of might,
Mother free.
Glory of moonlight dreams,
Over thy branches and lordly streams,
Clad in thy blossoming trees,
Mother, giver of ease
Laughing low and sweet!
Mother I kiss thy feet,
Speaker sweet and low!
Mother, to thee I bow.
Who hath said thou art weak in thy lands
When the sword flesh out in the seventy million hands
And seventy million voices roar
Thy dreadful name from shore to shore?
With many strengths who art mighty and stored,
To thee I call Mother and Lord!
Though who savest, arise and save!
To her I cry who ever her foeman drove
Back from plain and Sea And shook herself free.
Thou art wisdom, thou art law,
Thou art heart, our soul, our breath
Though art love divine, the awe
In our hearts that conquers death.
Thine the strength that nervs the arm,
Thine the beauty, thine the charm.
Every image made divine In our temples is but thine
Thou art Durga, Lady and Queen,
With her hands that strike and her
swords of sheen,
Thou art Lakshmi lotus-throned,
And the Muse a hundred-toned,
Pure and perfect without peer,
Mother lend thine ear,
Rich with thy hurrying streams,
Bright with thy orchard gleems,
Dark of hue O candid-fair
In thy soul, with jewelled hair
And thy glorious smile divine,
Lovilest of all earthly lands,
Showering wealth from well-stored hands!
Mother, mother mine!
Mother sweet, I bow to thee,
Mother great and free!
It is obvious from the translation that the later stanzas of the song depicts the motherland as a goddess...a notion that the followers of a number of religions are uncomfortable with. Also a cause of concern was the novel itself...Anandmath - in which the chief protaganist, Bhavananda, plans an armed rising against the Muslims of Bengal.
These are the reasons often cited as to why concerns were raised by the Muslim community even before independence against Vande Mataram.
In 1937 the Congress under the presidentship of Nehru, took cognizance of the concerns raise and made a statement seeking separation of the song from the novel. Noting its usage over the years the statement said -
"Thethe use of the first two stanzas of the song spread to other provinces and a certain national significance began to attach to them. The rest of the song was very seldom used, and is even now known by few persons. These two stanzas described in tender language the beauty of (the) motherland and the abundance of her gifts. There was absolutely nothing in them to which objection could be from the religious or any other point of view..."
"...The Committee recognizes the validity of the objection raised by Muslim friends to certain parts of the song. While the Committee have taken note of such objection insofar as it has intrinsic value, the Committee wish to point out that the modern evolution of the use of the song as part of National life is of infinitely greater importance than its setting in a historical novel before the national movement had taken shape."
Of course a statement like this makes no difference in India. Most people in the past and even now continue to get swayed by the religious authorities. But the point is that even then it was recognized that the first two stanzas do not carry any religious connotations and are actually a beautiful depiction of the nation.
The Supreme Court has ruled that singing of the national anthem is not necessary as long as no disrespect is shown towards it. What is valid for the national anthem is obviously valid for the national song, so clearly no one can force anyone to sing it but Vande Mataram has been proclaimed as our national song and therefore no community can disown it. There in lies the current problem. Ignorance has fostered fear among the Muslim community that they are being forced to sing it because the song is Hindu in nature. Fatwas have been repeatedly issued asking muslim parents not to allow their children to sing the song, democracy has been cited to state that the individual has the right to choose whether to sing the song or not...(in that case maybe we should have the right to follow/not follow any law in this country...this we do anyways :)) parties like BJP have repeatedly tried to get mileage out of the issue and have projected the choice of not singing as anti national.
Obviously both attitudes are wrong...what is required is for each and everyone to understand the meaning of the song and I doubt if there will be any confusion after that. So lets go and get to know our national song better!!
Friday, May 12, 2006
Democracy - A Note
I took a book on Democracy by Bernard Crick and it was an amazing journey on the development of the concept and its implementation as it stands today. I want to write this so that I can look back at it if/when I start forgetting what I read and what I felt while reading it.
Democracy as some philosophers feel is an "essentially contested concept", something that can never be defined universally but still is considered as the definition of a good government...or a pre-requisite at the very least. It is a term often (mis)used by the political class when trying to suggest superiority of one government over the other - "we are the largest democracy! We are more democratic then them" - and so on.
To understand it better one needs to be aware of the manner in which it evolved over time...That's what this note is going to be about.
The word first emerged around 4th century BC in Athens, Demokratia - the rule (kratos) of the people (demos). The earliest usage can be found in Plato's writings where he attacks it by calling it a rule of poor and ignorant over the educated and the knowledgeable. His fundamental opposition was between knowledge and opinion. (I for one find this distinction extremely interesting) To him democracy was the rule or rather the anarchy of mere opinion.
His pupil, Aristotle, modified the strong views - it was ok for some to rule with the consent of many...the "some" needed to have excellence (aristocrats in other words) while "many" didn't mean the entire population (most certainly not women and slaves). To be able to choose one needed to have some education and some property. But the requirement of knowledge remained at the forefront of things - "just because men are equal in somethings, they can not be considered equal in all."
With time the concept/doctrine of democracy took root and it was realized that involving its citizens made the state more stable. This idea was further developed by Machiavelli in his book Discourses, around the 17th century. Developing Aristotle's theory further he said that good laws to protect all are not good enough unless subjects become active citizens. They should try and seek responsibility. He understood that the state is a lot safer in the hands of people fighting for a cause(the state) rather than in the hands of armed militia...
And then with the French revolution the idea of democracy also got revolutionized....with aristocracy toppled over by common people...the rules of engagement changed. Suddenly everyone regardless of education and property had a right to make his contribution into the decision making process for it was felt that the greater common good is understood better by the common citizen than the aristocrats living in an artificial make believe world. This threw up a new issue...division between individual liberties and the rights of the state.
The fourth usage comes from the American constitution and most of the constitutions ever since (even though it was formed before America really became a democracy) - All can participate (and they should), all must mutually respect the equal rights of fellow citizens within a regulated legal order that defines, protects and limits those rights. A fusion of rights of the people and the idea of legally guaranteed individual rights. The two are distinct ideas and often contradictory (that’s what happens when you get lawyers involved...)
Of course in today's world, with all the information overload and media hype its difficult to combine freedom and popular power. Neither there is one right and valid method (cant think of any other word) to it. There remain a number of factors that shape its form and implementation - factors like religion, culture, etc. So one form of democracy is not automatically better than the other…it can only be the best that can be implemented under the given circumstances…and that's the key question…is it able to serve its purpose in its current form in a given region at a given period of time?
In the next part (if it comes), I ll write about what essentially makes a democracy tick..:)
Anyways, a round of applause to anyone who actually read all of that…haha…but the evolution of this doctrine is something I find fascinating. I highly recommend the book to anyone interested and a lot of what I wrote actually comes from its pages...
Thursday, June 09, 2005
Communal one day; secular the next!
The statement itself can be seen as an attempt at an image makeover, an attempt to move away from the right wing hardliner to an all encompasing moderate.
To me it represents the typical nature of the politics of the sub-continent: lack of any core beliefs and simply following the prejudices of the day. Looking back at Jinnah's history - "Messiah of Hindu-Muslim Unity" (1916), "Champion of the Two Nation Theory" (1940), dubbing Pakistan as a "laboratory of Islam" and following it up with a call to rise above religion and being citizens first (speech of August 11 1947 which Advani cited), one can easily see a politician at work. A similar pattern can be cited for Advani and perhaps for most politicians - ruthlessly using religion to forward their own cause and then trying to distance themselves from it once the purpose has been served.
What is saddening and at times annoying is the fact that people are unable to see past the rhetoric, the media meant to keep people informed is busy milking the story, I wonder how many people even know what Advani said and in what context; other politicians are either mocking Advani or trying to join the "me too" wagon and hailing the change in attitude; all blind to their own past aberrations.